Strengths and weaknesses of the Pollution Prevention Act


The Pollution Protection Act (PPA) is a regulatory law that aims to introduce or eliminating hazardous waste pollution in the United States. The Act does this in several ways including reducing waste at the source by changing production processes, promote the use of non-toxic or less toxic substances, implementing conservation techniques, and re-use materials. Since its enactment in 1990, there are many cases where the PPA has very well for shorter first pollution as well as the production costs associated with waste management. You will find a host of examples of your environmental organizations. However, the PPA is still largely under used and considered impractical. Congress, politicians and environmental regulators agree PPA missing basic tools that would optimize the function of the law in environmental rulemaking. Without a major update in the PPA will remain stagnant piece of environmental regulation.

The Pollution Protection Act came into law by Congress realized that there was a significant need to reduce pollution at source, thereby preventing future contamination. Before PPA, songs pollution had only addressed the treatment and proper disposal of pollution, not pollution. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for the successful implementation of the PPA. The EPA does this by setting up Source Reduction program. These programs gather information from states, and provides them with financial support to carry out related tasks. The EPA monitors the effectiveness of these programs by requiring agencies to submit compliance reports as toxic release reporting the results Apply toxins. One example is the right to know laws, which protect workers from being exposed to harmful substances by making them realize that the material they come in contact with the work.

right to know laws have been a great success in the organization. Still need PPA implementation of extensive cooperation state, and local levels of government, which is difficult to perform and limits the ability Prison. In addition to these difficulties, the PPA has dimensions translate between different cases. This difficulty is why the PPA is boldly criticized for weak rules language. For example, PPA does not clearly defined conditions prove progress or success of programs. According to the report, 2010 National Pollution Roundtable, the biggest obstacle to efficiency Prison is that it was impossible to translate units into one common denominator that would allow for the comparison of specific emission reduction, thus complicating data collection at the most basic level. The last major problem PPA is the lack of political and financial support it receives. Since 1990 there have been many changes to the PPA, however, shows how this food PPA has a good framework but lacks real teeth needed to compete politically.

Although it is effective in many cases, PPA lacks the 21 century methods. To strengthen the PPA several recommendations are necessary; first the PPA needs more solidarity method comparison and measurement of the data collected, it is almost impossible for it to become an effective regulatory framework and act without being able to measure performance. Second, the PPA must cause the favor of general environmental politics so it will get more attention and resources. The key technology for the PPA implementation is the amount of money investors save by reducing their production and decreasing environmental impact. More so than ever, companies have an incentive to follow regulations PPA and PPA has more to achieve the goal.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *